Fifty Shades in Flames: Organized Book Burning is a Go

Ariel Kroon August 28, 2012 4

Ralph Waldo Emerson once said “Every burned book enlightens the world.” Does Fifty Shades of Grey qualify?

Fifty Shades of Grey, one of the top-selling novels of our time and graduated Twilight fanfic, contains within its pages a lot of what one might call BDSM. I have not read the book (it lurks upon my desk like a dirty sock, faintly radiating filth), but I have it on pretty good authority from most of the internet that Christian and What’s-Her-Face are Doin’ It Wrong when it comes to the sadomasochistic roleplay.

So wrong, in fact, that Claire Phillipson, organizing force behind Wearside Women in Need’s event, feels that it is dangerous and harmful; so much so that Wearside is holding a Fifty Shades of Grey book-burning event. She spoke to the Daily Mail about it, saying:

I do not think I can put into words how vile I think this book is

Neither can I, but I haven’t made myself into a Guy Fawkes doll for every gossipy news outlet to burn me at the stake with Godwin’s Law because of it. Although it’s easy, I’m not going to add my voice to the many that are vilifying Ms Phillipson; to the contrary, the lady works for a domestic abuse charity; chances are she actually knows very well what she is talking about, and I think the least society can do is pay some attention. She is (in a heartbreaking way) an expert on the subject of foul, wrong relationships. Nobody should have to be. And I think that’s her point.

This article is brought to you by the word “Fahrenheit” and the numbers 4, 5, and 1.

The fact of the matter is, it’s been deeply entrenched in our cultural psyche that if you burn books, you are automatically the bad guy. There’s no coming back from it. Even if the book you’re burning happens to barely be worthy of the badge of “literature” and is literally right at this second causing young women to adjust just a tiny bit more towards accepting it when their partner gets rough without their permission.

Bad guys who burn books are usually the ones already in power; to our imaginations, it’s always some fascist dictator ruling with an iron fist who decides that he will take ALL THE KNOWLEDGE away from the poor hapless citizens. So what happens when battered women do it? It’s hard to think of a group more powerless in the first world; maybe the homeless, but many abused women do double duty on that front. This book burning will make absolutely no difference; it’s sold about a jillion copies worldwide, is in ebook format, and compared to that, Wearside’s demonstration is a single Ewok facing down a legion of Stormtroopers.

These women don’t want you to stop learning things; in fact, I suspect that they desperately want you to learn. They want you to learn the difference between depicting violence against women (as in American Psycho and DH Lawrence’s Rainbow, as the Daily Mail squawks) and glorifying it as something titillating, something that women should want. They want you to learn about abuse, they want you to learn about proper BDSM, they want you to learn that literature is powerful in ways we don’t usually think about in this day and age.

I’m not going to say that burning Fifty Shades is right. But I’m not going to say it’s wrong, either.

  • Allison

    I heard about this last week, and I really had no idea what to think. On the one hand, I ABHOR book burning. But obviously, on the other hand, I also abhor sexual assault. Its hard to reconcile those two things.

    I guess I’ve come to the conclusion that while I admire Ms. Phillipson’s goals, I do not approve of her methods. There are other ways of getting her message across rather than book burning. Writing her own book? Protesting at bookstores and maybe the 50 Shades publisher’s office? There are definitely other methods. Although, granted, none would probably get half the attention a public book burning will receive, but then again, I don’t think this is the type of attention she will want brought to her cause. Knowing the mainstream media, her incredibly important message will get distorted into some variant of “angry women are angry about men” and the usual anti-feminist crap will get spewed at them.

    There are better ways for her to get her message across. Book burning is NEVER okay (I think), but more than that, this is an important message, and I think in this case book burning will also prove wholly ineffective, and probably even detract from her cause.

    • Ariel Kroon

      Yeah, I really had to sit down and have a long think about this whole thing. I also abhor book-burning, but in my mind, Fifty Shades isn’t even a legit book, so… the scales tip.
      Book-burning brings out such a visceral reaction in people, even people who are not usually book-y or who don’t read a whole lot aside from news articles. I think that Ms Phillipson got what she wanted; that being the attention of the world on her message that this book is dangerous.
      Maybe I’m just sympathetic because, in desperate situations, my brain often grasps towards the most extreme and destructive last resort; when you feel powerless, perhaps it is a measure of comfort to hold sway over others, even through their shock/horror at what you are doing.

  • JeN

    I read and disliked the Twilight series. I took a bet to read the 50 Shades series (am currently forcing my way through book 2).

    These books make Twilight look like literary gold. Christian Grey and Ana Steele in 50 Shades, atrocious writing or not, make Edward and Bella almost seem like ideal characters. Edward mostly just creepily stalked Bella and wanted a long-term relationship with her even though they didn’t have anything in common.

    On the other hand, Christian Grey is the epitome of the abusive companion. He controls Ana’s entire life, usually without her permission (though he claims she has the power). She is not permitted to see her friends/family, access her own bank account, or even keep a job without Christian taking over her choices. She repeatedly expresses unease with his attitude and he routinely distracts her with intercourse instead of letting her explain what she is feeling when he does those things.
    The fact that this book romanticizes an abusive relationship by disguising it as a titillating erotic fantasy sickens me.
    Ana is probably the dumbest main character I have ever come across in a book. She is uncomfortable with the way Christian treats her and brushes all that aside since she is infatuated with the actions of the bedroom. Knowing that so many people have read (and enjoyed) these novels makes me nervous for what younger girls/women will now base their relationships on.

    These books make me wish I were illiterate and I haven’t even made it to book 3 yet!

    • Ariel Kroon

      “These books make me wish I were illiterate”

      I am so using that later.